A lawsuit has been filed in California over illegal levels of arsenic found in inexpensive wines sold there. Here is a (Link to the list of wines) Here is a (Link to a news story) The lack of labeling regarding wine additives is coming to a head in California, which is where you would expect it to happen in the U.S. The use of many additives has been addressed on this blog before via two well-researched articles from Joey Casco at TheWineStalker.net – (Link to that post). The pressure to take bulk fruit and make it uniform in the wine making process for these inexpensive wines leads many of them to use additives that rang from undesirable to unsafe. Perhaps this lawsuit, brought by four individuals, may lead the way to more open reporting of what is going into wine.
UPDATE: This article (LINK) from Vinography is worth reading – giving another perspective on the matter. I still say, there are many reasons not to drink cheap wine. The arsenic thing may not even be the most compelling.
Two smart rebuttals to this whole arsenic-in-wine foofrah from @vinography & @wblakegray – http://www.vinography.com/archives/2015/03/do_you_need_to_worry_about_ars.html … & http://www.wine-searcher.com/m/2015/03/scaremongers-spark-fear-over-arsenic-in-wine
These are worth a look to get another perspective on the issue.
LikeLike